Policy

Reverse Mortgage Group Seeks Restoration of HUD Counseling Funds

Congress has not yet restored the money. Sellers considering a reverse mortgage should plan for possible counseling delays before relying on one.

Entrance of the Robert C. Weaver Federal Building, headquarters of HUD, in Washington
HUD headquarters, the Robert C. Weaver Federal Building, in Washington. Photo: U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) / Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association asked congressional appropriations leaders on Nov. 2, 2026, to restore funding for the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s housing counseling program. The request centers on counseling required before a federally insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, or HECM, can close.

The funding request does not change HECM rules yet

NRMLA’s letter responds to a presidential pocket rescission affecting money already appropriated for HUD housing counseling. The trade group warned that reduced funding could make mandatory counseling harder or more expensive to obtain, disrupting reverse mortgage originations.

This is a request for congressional action, not an enacted restoration of funding. No new effective date or replacement process was announced in the source report. The existing counseling requirement remains in place: A prospective HECM borrower must complete a session with a HUD-approved agency and obtain a counseling certificate before the loan can legally close.

The independence of that session is deliberate. According to NRMLA, lenders cannot pay for the borrower’s counseling, steer the borrower toward a particular counseling provider or use a provider affiliated with the lender. Those restrictions are intended to give older homeowners an outside explanation of the loan’s costs, continuing obligations and alternatives.

NRMLA has substantial reach within the industry. Its letter said the association represents more than 300 companies and over 2,000 delegates, with its members originating more than 90% of reverse mortgages. That does not determine what Congress will do, but it shows why the funding issue is being treated as a potential marketwide bottleneck rather than a dispute involving one lender.

Sellers should not treat a reverse mortgage as a fixed-timeline alternative

For homeowners deciding whether to sell, the immediate concern is timing. A HECM can be an alternative to selling when an eligible owner wants to draw on equity and remain in the home. But the loan cannot simply move forward while required counseling is unresolved.

If counseling capacity shrinks, appointment availability could become uneven. A homeowner might finish the lender’s initial steps but still be unable to reach closing on the expected schedule. The reported funding dispute does not prove that every counseling agency will face delays, and it does not mean HECM lending has stopped. It does mean sellers should avoid building a financial plan around an assumed reverse mortgage closing date until the counseling appointment is completed and the certificate is issued.

That matters when a homeowner is comparing three different paths: remaining in the property with a reverse mortgage, selling and moving, or waiting while using other resources. Those choices have different costs and timelines. A listing decision should not be postponed indefinitely because a loan is described as possible, nor should a home be listed solely because counseling appears difficult to schedule.

Ask the counseling agency and lender separate questions. The agency can address appointment availability, any fee and the counseling certificate. The lender can explain its underwriting and closing process. Keeping those roles separate is consistent with the independence rules NRMLA described.

Existing reverse mortgage borrowers face a different selling issue

The funding warning concerns the infrastructure for counseling prospective HECM borrowers. HousingWire’s report did not identify a change to the terms of existing reverse mortgages or announce a new restriction on selling a home that already has one.

An owner with an existing reverse mortgage who plans to sell should therefore focus first on the loan payoff process, not assume the counseling-funding dispute has altered the current account. Request a current payoff statement from the servicer and ask how long the quoted amount remains valid. Then compare the expected payoff and selling expenses with a realistic estimate of the property’s sale proceeds.

This distinction is especially important for families helping an older owner prepare a move. A news report about new-loan counseling can easily be mistaken for a freeze on all reverse mortgage activity. The information available here does not support that conclusion.

Sellers also should not rely on an informal equity number from an old statement. Interest and other permitted loan charges can affect the balance over time. The servicer’s current figures, together with the expected sale price and transaction costs, provide a more useful picture of what may remain after closing.

Build extra time into any sale-versus-HECM decision

Homeowners actively evaluating a HECM should verify that the counselor is HUD-approved before paying for or completing a session. They should also ask whether the appointment will produce the certificate required for the loan process. A general financial consultation may be useful, but it is not necessarily the required HECM counseling session.

Do not let a lender choose the counseling provider, promise to cover the session or push an affiliated agency. NRMLA identified those practices as prohibited. If the process appears bundled together, pause and confirm the provider’s status independently.

Sellers working against a move date should prepare a parallel timeline. Estimate how long a conventional sale might take, identify any repairs or cleanout work that could delay listing, and determine whether temporary housing or other transition costs would arise. On the HECM side, track the counseling appointment, certificate, lender review and any property-related requirements communicated by the lender.

Congress could restore the counseling money, leave the funding reduction in place or address the program through another appropriations decision. Until action is final, the practical move is not to predict the outcome. It is to avoid making an irreversible housing decision based on a closing date that still depends on mandatory third-party counseling.

For sellers, the key dividing line is simple: an existing HECM and a proposed HECM are not the same issue. Existing borrowers preparing to sell should verify their payoff. Homeowners considering a new reverse mortgage should confirm counseling access before treating that loan as a dependable substitute for a sale.

Sources and methodology

This briefing is based on reporting from 1 outlet; the story was first reported Nov. 6, 2026.

Written with AI-assisted drafting from the sources listed and reviewed under our editorial standards. Found an error? See our corrections policy. The photo is illustrative and does not show a property named in this story unless the caption says so.

Local Home Buyers USA buys homes directly from sellers. This coverage is editorial analysis, not legal, tax or financial advice.

Local Home Buyers USA Editorial Team

The Local Home Buyers USA Editorial Team byline covers rapid-response real estate news produced through our AI-assisted editorial pipeline, which fetches reporting from established real estate outlets and drafts seller-focused briefings…

Latest in Policy & Regulation

All Policy →

Get the seller briefing by email

New Seller Intelligence coverage in your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

Local Home Buyers USA is a direct buyer of residential real estate, not a licensed broker. Seller Intelligence is editorial commentary based on named sources and public data; it is not legal, tax or financial advice. Editorial standards.